Perjury & Gianelli's Obsession With Chad Knaak

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:24 AM
Subject: Re:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, Glenn Greenwald <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Harriet Ryan <harriet.ryan@latimes.com>, "hailey.branson" <hailey.branson@latimes.com>, media <media@aclu.org>

To the ACLU,

The DA and City Attorney of Los Angeles are very clear:  the only individual in LA who can demand an execution is Steve Cooley.  That's a dangerous precedent and absurd.  These people are not only corrupt, they are INSANE.

All the best,
Kelley

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Mr. Riordan,

I suppose they can't locate the non-existent Jane Doe.  The fact that Gianelli knows who Chad Knaak  is really freaks people out.  I think Chad Knaak, who has witnessed quite a lot, can handle himself.  He also will have information about "Tara Cooper" and other liars.  His mother is also a witness to quite a lot.  I think my perjury declaration is fine and, if necessary, will appeal that issue. 

Love,
Kelley

On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:

To the FBI,

Let me reiterate this (since Gianelli is obsessed with perjury now and Cohen's is extensive): 128. Every person who, by willful perjury or subornation of perjury procures the conviction and execution of any innocent person, is punishable by death or life imprisonment without possibility of parole. The penalty shall be determined pursuant to Sections 190.3 and 190.4.

While I was working on an ACLU campaign, as clearly noted in my email that the DA and City Attorney have attempted to LIE about, Cooley was running around demanding the death penalty for people and recommended using a drug that is used to put animals to sleep.  The California Penal Code is clear - when you use willful perjury to procure the conviction and execution of any innocent person, the punishment is death (execution, obviously) or life imprisonment.  I am convinced that Phillip received a death sentence and think (at least in theory) that this statute applies.  I suppose the DA and City Attorney don't like that fact.  After all, they have a pattern of targeting innocent people.  I still want to know why the DA and City Attorney think there is a Wedding Party and I have appointed my CIA and FBI directors while serving as President of the United States.  First, the FBI might want to speak with Michael Ingrassia, Tyler Paxton, and the other people at GCI who played the game I made up while there:  state your platform, appoint your cabinet, etc.  My platform would be cleaning up corruption because it has undermined the fabric of the U.S. and it is rampant.  And do speak to my mother:  ask her if she actually believes she is my Deputy FBI Director OR if she thinks I've run into the motherlode of liars and crackheads.  Her answer should prove enlightening.

Paulette Brandt also received this psychotic criminally harassing email from Gianelli.

All the best,
Kelleyt

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:04 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: STEPHEN R. GIANELLI <stephengianelli@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 1:24 AM
Subject:
To: blind <distribution@gmail.com>

Kelley,

Get a clue:

2015.5.  Whenever, under any law of this state or under any rule,
regulation, order or requirement made pursuant to the law of this
state, any matter is required or permitted to be supported,
evidenced, established, or proved by the sworn statement,
declaration, verification, certificate, oath, or affidavit, in
writing of the person making the same (other than a deposition, or an
oath of office, or an oath required to be taken before a specified
official other than a notary public), such matter may with like force
and effect be supported, evidenced, established or proved by the
unsworn statement, declaration, verification, or certificate, in
writing of such person which recites that it is certified or declared
by him or her to be true under penalty of perjury, is subscribed by
him or her, and (1), if executed within this state, states the date
and place of execution, or (2), if executed at any place, within or
without this state, states the date of execution and that it is so
certified or declared under the laws of the State of California. The
certification or declaration may be in substantially the following
form:
   (a) If executed within this state:

   "I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the
foregoing is true and correct":
_____________   _________
(Date and Place)       (Signature)

   (b) If executed at any place, within or without this state:

   "I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of
the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct":
_____________   _________
   (Date)          (Signature)