Tuesday, January 14, 2014

Don't Ignore My Disclaimer


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Subject: Re: Drone Cards
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>


Vivienne,

Don't ignore my DISCLAIMER. 

Kelley Lynch


NOTE;  THIS CARD IS BEING SENT TO DENNIS RIORDAN AS AN ATTACHMENT.  IT IS NOT A THREAT AGAINST ANYONE INCLUDING STARK RAVING LUNATICS WITH MOTIVE.


On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mr. Riordan,

I would like your opinion on the prosecutor's position re. the drone card I sent to my friends on Valentine's Day.  They all thought it was cute.  I did send it the FBI as an example of the lunacy I'm dealing with.  Since my trial was really a mini-Phil Spector murder trial that attempted to sabotage the IRS, I do need Phillip and his legal counsel to weigh in.  I hope you crossed Cutler's name off my letters and inserted yours.  I, of course, want Phillip and his legal team's position on Streeter wanted me drugged and committed over that.  My mother thought it could be viewed as attempted murder because it could have killed me.  I met with the psychiatrist (my request) at Lynwood.  I would like you to review that file/matter.

All the best,
Kelley

NOTE;  THIS CARD IS BEING SENT TO DENNIS RIORDAN AS AN ATTACHMENT.  IT IS NOT A THREAT AGAINST ANYONE INCLUDING STARK RAVING LUNATICS WITH MOTIVE.

Drone5555

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 3:43 PM
Subject: Drone Cards
To: "kelley.lynch.2010" <Kelley.Lynch.2010@gmail.com>


Posted by at No comments:

Blackmail Re. My Property Stored At Lawrence's


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:28 AM
Subject: Fwd:
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>, "Lauren E. Dodge" <led@gagenmccoy.com>, Receptionist <danville@gagenmccoy.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, Francisco Suarez <francisco.suarez.lawoffice@gmail.com>


To the IRS and FBI,

I've let my good friend, Michael Ingrassia, know that Paulette offered to rent a car to pick up my property but the TRO prevents that.  I don't want him to be confused about my intentions and a TRO cannot prevent me from speaking with my friends, even Michael who lives with Ray Lawrence and sent me the outrageous email between Gianelli and Lawrence re. Doug Davis/FTB.  He also was reporting Gianelli to Pleasant Hill PD because he felt he was being harassed.  Many people felt that way - including Mario and Paulette.  This matter concerns Michael Ingrassia, obviously.

All the best,
Kelley


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:25 AM
Subject:
To: Michael Ingrassia <micedwing@gmail.com>, Paulette Brandt <paulettebrandt8@gmail.com>


Michael,

I want you to know (but am not communicating with Lawernce) that Paulette Brandt offered to rent a car to pick up my property/evidence on July 19th.  The fraud TRO prevents that.  You were a great friend of mine and this situation is unconscionable.  In any event, I just want you to know that this was actually resolved but I am legally prevented from picking up my property/evidence.  You told me that the offer to store my property was open ended and I agree but Lawrence and I do have an agreement in writing and that should be honored.  Destroying or selling my evidence, including what is contained on my computers and hard drives, is outrageous - particularly as I am addressing these matters in various legal matters I am involved with and that now includes this fraud TRO as Lawrence accused me of embezzling from Cohen which is outrageous.  I would appreciate it if you would refrain from contacting my sons as they really should not have been dragged into any of this.  Thank you. 
Kelley
Posted by at No comments:

Cohen Stole From Me & Steven Machat


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Hi
To: "Lauren E. Dodge" <led@gagenmccoy.com>, danville@gagenmccoy.com, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>


To the IRS and FBI,

I didn't have time to copy all the evidence for Steven Machat.  That would include documents at Lawrence's.  I haven't provided the IRS or FTB with all the evidence at Lawrence.'s.  I would like an IRS opinion on Dodge's position that Lawrence can destroy and/or sell my property/evidence, particularly in light of our agreement.

Kelley


On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Lauren Dodge,

This is an email from Steven Machat.  He advises me that he is suing the two evil liars, Cohen and Kory.  He has been clear publicly - Cohen has stolen from him as well.  Cohen stole from me.  He then filed a fraudulent and retaliatory lawsuit against me.  Lawrence is aware of all of this but decided to use Cohen against me?  Well, he cannot say he relied on Cohen in good faith since he has evidence  proving otherwise.

Kelley Lynch


From: <smachat@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 9:26 PM
Subject: Hi
To: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>

I need the stranger papers as I am about to sue those 2 evil liars. Cohen and his Satin, Kory.

Please get it to me tomorrow.

I can not keep waiting.

Thanks and be safe.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
Posted by at No comments:

Ray Lawrence Motive


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:43 PM
Subject: Re: Your Letter
To: Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com>, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>
Cc: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>


Vivienne Swanigan,

The email Lawrence sent Paulette Brandt was forwarded to me so I am a recipient.  My friends have been criminally harassed and have confirmed that.  I provided a copy of that letter to law enforcement.  See the IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, FTB, and LAPD.  I also, as I discussed with my lawyer today, sent a copy of that evidence to you.  Why?  Because I am being threatened and blackmailed.  LAPD's TMU told me they would handle this situation if the harassment continued.  It has and Michelle Rice was copied in on many emails.  Lawrence has criminally harassed my sons and Ray Lindsey wrote him, Gianelli, and Walsh that their emails have made him physically ill.

For the record, Cohen committed tax fraud; stole millions from me and Machat & Machat; perjured himself excessively; and has NOT provided me with the IRS required 1099.  The illegal K-1s completely undermine his fraudulent expense ledger.
Lawrence seems to think he can threaten and blackmail me using the City Attorney's office.  He has been advised to cease and desist.  Gianelli has targeted me since 2009.  Walsh is Cohen's fan.  People view them as criminals. 

Kelley Lynch


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Ray Lawrence,

Cease and desist.  You and your friend wrote the pornographic email.  It was forwarded to me and I provided it to law enforcement.  I am advising you to stop lying to me and stop attempting to blackmail me. 
The issue with respect to my property will be addressed in a letter.  You are in breach of our original agreement and NOTHING gives you the right to change that or threaten to provide my documents (and Rutger's Whole Foods files, etc.) to Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice.

Kelley Lynch


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com> wrote:
Lynch,

You just admitted that you were not a direct recipient of my e-mail ([letter]), You only became aware of and received that e-mail because Paula Brandt forwarded it to you. You then deliberately forwarded that "obscene" e-mail to numerous individuals (including your own children) and government entities, in violation of  Penal Code section 653m - an offense that you were convicted of multiple times in 2012, did 9 months in custody for, and are on probation for. You furthermore had the unmitigated gall of claiming I could have subjected your children to the contents of that e-mail, when you yourself are the only person responsible for making your children aware of the contents of that e-mail.

In regards, to your belongings, please be aware of the following, according to California Civil Code section 1987 (b):

6. If, after the deadline, there is any property which was not claimed by the tenants or any other people notified, depending on the circumstances, the landlord must do one of two things with the remaining property:
a. If the landlord reasonably believes that the property is worth less than $300, he or she may keep it, give it away, sell it or destroy it.
b. If the property is reasonably believed to be worth $300 or more, the landlord should arrange to have it sold at a public bidding sale after giving notice of the sale through publication. Both the landlord and the tenant have a right to bid on the property at the sale. After the property is sold, the landlord may deduct the costs of storage, advertising the sale, and conducting the sale. The remaining money must then be paid over to the county. 

I was not aware until your e-mail just now of any computer equipment you were storing in my home. I now know from your own declaration as well as from Michael Ingrassia that you moved additional belongings of yours from your storage depot in Berkeley to my home, using Michael's car - driven by Tyler Paxton, while I was away from home on business and while Michael was away from home between 5/25/13 and 05/29/13, helping me with the drive home from Minnesota. Your action was a clear attempt to defraud me by moving unauthorized items into my home- including alleged EVIDENCE and expensive equipment - that had not been present in my home EVER before 5/25/13. I also know from your son, Rutger, that the reason you snuck in your additional belongings that until then had been stored in Berkeley, is because your sister, Karen, stopped paying the storage fees on the Berkeley storage depot. I have copies of e-mails from last year proving that your EVIDENCE was all stored in your storage depot in Berkeley. I never gave you permission, either implicit or explicit, to transfer the contents of your storage depot to my home. My statement to you that you could store your belongings in my garage was based on my knowledge of the scant possessions you had in my home as of the date I left for Minnesota (Feb. 20, 2013). Those possessions consisted of little more than a few boxes and a few articles of clothing. I will now have to take a closer look at the items you snuck into my garage without my authorization or agreement. If, as you allege, there are indeed multiple laptops, hard drives, and an Apple Tower (hard to tell from casual inspection the way you crammed so many boxes into my garage), and assuming they are in proper functioning order, then indeed the value would exceed $300 and I would be obliged under California law to hold a public sale of your belongings and turn the proceeds over to the county. It is doubtful that any of your records would have any resale value, and therefore would most likely have to be destroyed or sent to the landfill.

You still have the opportunity to claim your belongings by July 5, 2013, as I generously extended the deadline from June 22, 2013. If you are unable to claim your possessions in person, you may provide a signed, written, and notarized authorization for a 3rd party to claim your belongings. Reasonable storage fees, payable only in cash, will be due at the time your belongings are claimed.

R. Lawrence


On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Ray Lawrence,

Your letter was forwarded to me by Paulette Brandt.  You are lying - my belongings are worth far more than $300.  You left out items, such as my two laptop computers, Apple Tower, external hard drive, and other items that Michael Ingrassia is aware of.  You are not in a position legally to simply change agreements.  A letter will be mailed to you addressing the deceitful statements you have made and your threats to destroy my property and turn my records over to Leonard Cohen's lawyer, Michelle Rice.

For the record, Doug Davis/FTB and I have spoken personally.  I don't owe taxes and view your email as a conspiracy.  I spoke to a lawyer about it today.
Please stop harassing people in my life.  You know hw to ask Walsh and Gianelli to remove you.  Mario Lara and Paulette Brandt have both advised you to CEASE AND DESIST. 

Kelley Lynch

cc:  IRS, FBI, DOJ, Treasury, and FTB
Posted by at No comments:

It's About Criminal Harassment, Threats, Blackmail, Intimidation Tactics, Perjury, Fraud, Theft, Concealment, Etc.

From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: Out of the Office Re: Your Gmail address, kelley.lynch.2013@gmail.com, has been created
To: Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org>
, "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>


Vivienne Swanigan,

No, it's not about workplace violence.  It's about criminal harassment, threats, blackmail, intimidation tactics, perjury, fraud, theft, concealment, etc.  Perhaps you would like to receive this filthy email.  I'm waiting to hear back from the CIA.  I think the threat has to be credible.  I don't have access to a drone so I need to know if the CIA lends them out.

Kelley  Lynch

From: Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 5:44 PM
Subject: Re: Hot furry bottom bear for hot dominant top - 50 (concord / pleasant hill / martinez)
To: Dante Griffin <319f7296a8843a1391265d26743e389f@reply.craigslist.org>


Can you host?

What do you like to get into?




On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Dante Griffin <319f7296a8843a1391265d26743e389f@reply.craigslist.org> wrote:
I am but Im not mobile. I live in Concord.
On Jun 22, 2013 5:42 PM, "craigslist 3838199589" <cwvd9-3838199589@pers.craigslist.org> wrote:
Hey guy. I just saw your e-mail response to my Craigslist ad. It got caught up in my spam filter so I didn't see it before. Are you still interested in some hot, sweaty sex with a nasty, kinky, handsome bottom bear? I'm in Pleasant Hill.


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Dante Griffin <319f7296a8843a1391265d26743e389f@reply.craigslist.org> wrote:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/m4m/3838199589.html
Hi.My name is Chris,26 young,big thick red 9 inch cut cock,5'8,175lbs,Puerto Rican & Blk,love to rim,suck,kink,Im a top vers, call me and I will send a pic,very serious,no games.Lication Concord,Ca.

Original craigslist post:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/m4m/3838199589.html
About craigslist mail:
http://craigslist.org/about/help/email-relay
Please flag unwanted messages (spam, scam, other):
http://craigslist.org/mf/53a0554c9122fdcc1e19477087d706e5a7716434.2

Original craigslist post:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/m4m/3838199589.html
About craigslist mail:
http://craigslist.org/about/help/email-relay
Please flag unwanted messages (spam, scam, other):
http://craigslist.org/mf/8a970b50e56bf839e180435eb62714a82ed3a9d3.1

Original craigslist post:
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/m4m/3838199589.html
About craigslist mail:
http://craigslist.org/about/help/email-relay
Please flag unwanted messages (spam, scam, other):
http://craigslist.org/mf/7abb75754828c6318b7f4ae1a75e92d303d01f90.1


On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Vivienne Swanigan <vivienne.swanigan@lacity.org> wrote:
I am out of the office from June 20 through July 4, scheduled to return on Friday, July 5, 2013.  I will not have access to e-mail during my absence.
If this is regarding a workplace violence matter requiring immediate attention, please contact support staff for referral to another WV attorney.
 
*****************Confidentiality Notice *************************
This electronic message transmission contains information
from the Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney, which may be confidential or protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or the work product doctrine. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying,
distribution or use of the content of this information is prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message and any attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
********************************************************************

Posted by at No comments:

I Am Being Criminally Harassed .. Did Cohen Simply Place One Call To the TMU Celebrity Unit?


From: Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: Bottom line - I do not like the targeting of mothers
To: "*irs. commissioner" <*IRS.Commissioner@irs.gov>, Washington Field <washington.field@ic.fbi.gov>, ASKDOJ <ASKDOJ@usdoj.gov>, "Kelly.Sopko" <Kelly.Sopko@tigta.treas.gov>, "Doug.Davis" <Doug.Davis@ftb.ca.gov>, Dennis <Dennis@riordan-horgan.com>, rbyucaipa <rbyucaipa@yahoo.com>, Robert MacMillan <robert.macmillan@gmail.com>, moseszzz <moseszzz@mztv.com>, a <anderson.cooper@cnn.com>, wennermedia <wennermedia@gmail.com>, "Hoffman, Rand" <rand.hoffman@umusic.com>, Mick Brown <mick.brown@telegraph.co.uk>, woodwardb <woodwardb@washpost.com>, "glenn.greenwald" <glenn.greenwald@guardiannews.com>, lrohter <lrohter@nytimes.com>, info <info@kibi-edu.org>, "YesheRimpoche@aol.com" <bhakhatulku@yahoo.com>, lodigg@savetibet.org, Mario Lara <mariolara@mac.com>, wfrayeh <wfrayeh@da.lacounty.gov>, jthompson <jthompson@da.lacounty.gov>, OIGCOMPL OIGCOMPL <oigcompl@lapd.lacity.org>, MEDIA RELATIONS PIO <pio@lapd.lacity.org>, chaleffg <chaleffg@lapd.lacity.org>, "SandraJo.Streeter" <SandraJo.Streeter@lacity.org>, John Penick <mr.synt4xerror@gmail.com>, Ray Lawrence <monchobear@gmail.com>, Karen Lynch <klynch123@msn.com>


Sandra Jo Streeter,
I am pro per in the writ.   I am being criminally harassed by Leonard Cohen's fan, Susanne Walsh, and Stephen  Gianelli.  Michelle Rice has been copied in.  Gianelli is now writing me that Pat Dixon targeted me. 
Rutger Penick is a material witness.  You targeted him and now Cohen's fan, Gianelli, andn Rice, are targeting him.  I am advising you to cease and desist.

Kelley Lynch


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rand,
Pat Dixon's wet dream about Eminem.  I'm in a Pat Dixon Wet Dream.  Until I collapse. Eminem is taking the stand. 

Love,
Kelley


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1xXYeNrW9k


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mario,
Until I collapse.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1xXYeNrW9k
Love,
Kelley


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mario,

You're the hair dresser to the stars - and know Cohen's a pathological liar with motive.  What do you think of my witnesses?  How about their hair?

Love,
Kelley




On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mario,

Be honest.  If you had to critique this woman, what would you say?  This is Cohen's operative.  Forget the criminal tax fraud and theft.  I'm in a beauty pageant now. 
Love,
Kelley

Susanne Walsh


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
This is the lunatic calling me a bag.  LOVE the bangs, no? 


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Mario,

I need you to do my hair.  I'm in a beauty pageant with Cohen's fan who is targeting my children and Karen,etc.  Check her out.

Love,
Kelley

Susanne Walsh


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
THE BEAUTY PAGEANT

Susanne Walsh


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
CULT VICTIM WITH MOTIVE SUSANNE WALSH GONE WILD


https://www.facebook.com/susanne.walsh1


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
MOTIVE

Odzer Chenma
Your FB page? Do you think you have a right to slander me through FB? No. Cease and desist. Your response is unacceptable. Michele Blaine publicly congratulated Gianelli for targeting my emails and blogs. I think you are part of this highly coordinated campaign to discredit me, obviously. What's your MOTIVE, Walsh? What would cause you to target my children for Leonard Cohen with his lawyers copied in? You're not merely a fan. You have MOTIVE.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
P.S. I'm now in a beauty contest with Leonard Cohen.
The GODS of LA Superior Court have exposed me to unconscionable insanity and my sons and family continue to be targeted.  So  much for reality.  No evidenced needed.  Fraud, lies, concealment, perjury, etc. will suffice in La La Land.  The judge even got in on the fun - lying about me on the record.  Such sleaze is inconceivable until you witness corruption up close and personal and people lying about being Buddhist.

Gods, Gangsters & Honour by Steven Machat
Excerpts:


Leonard was desperate to get rid of this two managers, Judy Berger and Mary Martin, who he believed had stolen the rights to his songs and records early on in his career.  Even back then, Cohen was convinced that women were ripping him off.  He signed an agreement, and when he wanted to get rid of the contract, he accused everyone of ripping him off.  You could say it became repeat behaviour.  My father duly got rid of Berger and Martin, set up a new company called Stranger Music for Cohen and agreed to manage Leonard for 15% as well as 15% of Stranger.  The idea of the company was twofold:  one, to maintain ownership of the copyrights duly created; and two, to minimise Leonard’s exposure to American tax, just like any other rich individual trying to minimise their tax liabilities.  


I’ve no problem with people trying to avoid tax, but as the years have passed, I couldn’t help but smile at the apparent contradiction between Leonard’s public persona and his private business arrangements.  This was a supposedly devout Buddhist with no interest in material possessions, who was all the same happy to put his trust in business managers and companies he created with his knowledge and consent whose sole aim was to minimise tax liability.  


Leonard then sold Stranger Music for a small fortune and I’ve seen nothing from Cohen.


Cohen controlled his copyright, not my father.  The irony was that Cohen had total control over my father …  Do you know what happened to the $400,000 worth of bearer bonds in my father’s office?  Bearer bonds are just unregistered bonds or paper money that are used to conceal ownership and, with it, tax liabilities.  Cristini told me (who knows if this is true?) that he had found the bonds in my father’s office hours after he had died but the next day they disappeared.


Cohen denied any knowledge of these bonds.  I was unsure if they existed or were part of my father’s schemes cooked up to conceal Leonard’s money.  


Cohen said:  “Steven, you remember the 1988 tour?  Flemming extorted $100,000 from me.  He wanted 20% managerial commission, in addition to his promoter’s fees.  He thought he was doing extra work for me and wanted me to pay him.”


Far from being the poet of the spirits, Leonard was a hustler using Buddhism as a facade.  


The next time I would see Leonard … We’d just seen The Hand That Rocks The Cradle where Rebecca De Mornay plays the psychopathic nanny who stalks this family.  Who should walk along but Cohen, who was holding hands with DeMornay, his girlfriend at the time.  Cohen was extremely uncomfortable because he knew he had stolen from me and it was clear he couldn’t get away quick enough.  Neither could my son, because he took one look at DeMornay and ran.  He was terrified because he thought she was the nanny in the film!


It was clear that Leonard was also wary of me because, I guess, he thought I might be planning to sue him.


Leonard told me that when he had gone off on his Buddhist retreat Kelley was left managing his business interests.  He said:  “She started believing this money was hers and she started spending it.  All of it.  When I got back from my pilgrimage, I went to withdraw money left in the account to cover the draft.  I was speechless.  I didn’t know where to look, where to turn or what to think.”


Then Leonard told me that Kelley had bought a multi-million dollar house in Mandeville Canyon with his money … Leonard said:  We didn’t even get the house back.  Kelley stopped paying the mortgage so the house got repossessed and the mortgage company took everything in the house as well.


Lynch had been sending out long and bizarre emails to his friends, journalists, and the authorities denouncing Leonard for a million and one sins, which would have worried me if I was their target.


The whole scheme was so ridiculous [Leonard Cohen’s attempts to limit his liabilities on the deals] from the start.  All Leonard had to do to avoid U.S. taxes was tear up his green card, and stop living in and using the U.S. as his base.  


It’s no secret that Leonard has also made a killing on the art market by selling his paintings, plus his touring of the last two years … If that’s true, it doesn’t really tally with the clear implication from Cohen that he is a man who has been robbed of everything.


Leonard told me before I left that he had actually offered Kelley a settlement …



It’s clear that Cohen and his lawyers want to heap the blame on Kelley’s shoulders for more than just revenge.  Because Cohen’s pension assets were cashed in … ahead of schedule they are liable to tax so they need to establish that this situation is her fault.  The penalties could actually be greater than the tax itself.  


Leonard has cast himself into a hell of his own making. 


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
To the FBI,
The first DA to hit Golok, Tibet - Steve Cooley.  Corruption is universal.
All the best,
Kelley


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Lodi Gyari,

Didn't your daughter marry a relative of Dzigar Kongtrul Rinpoche's?  Well, Rinpoche has helped me throughout this ordeal and I have heard from Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche recently.  I've advised him that my teacher, Sharmapa, has been targeted and I find that distressing.  Is Sharmapa fat?

All the best,
Kelley


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Lodi Gyari,

Ha Ha.
All the best,
Kelley


IXth Korzok Rinpoche
Oh ya sure I will keep u in my pray dnt worry.. H E telling me about u he he tk care hop see u some day


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, LA Confidential has now hit Ladakh.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
He He.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
The liars at LA Superior Court will not change reality.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
HIS EMINENCE CHOEGON RINPOCHE

IXth Korzok Rinpoche
Oh ya sure I will keep u in my pray dnt worry.. H E telling me about u he he tk care hop see u some day


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
SLANDER

Odzer Chenma
where's your evidence, Walsh? And, what is the issue? Not a defense to criminal tax fraud and theft.
Susanne Walsh
Ms. Lynch, you are not only a washed out, alcoholic old bag, you are a mean and nasty, inside and out, old bag. I don't care about all your lies about Cohen, I like his music and what I know about him as a man, and your lies and slander will not change that. Stay in your black hole and cultivate your hate and wave good bye to your "family" they obviously don't care about you and neither do I.
16:09
Odzer Chenma
Walsh, I have no issues with alcohol or anything else for that matter. It's not a defense to criminal tax fraud or theft in any event. Fine, I'm an old bag. Cohen looked like a former meth addict perjuring himself on the witness stand. Does he want to compete now for who is cuter? How pathetic. That's where Leonard Cohen's mind has gone re. his theft, criminal tax fraud, false allegations about Phil Spector, etc. Well, perhaps the FBI's Quantico should actually profile him since he thinks we're in a beauty pageant. Leonard Cohen is the liar who perjures himself in every court of law he rolls into. Wave goodbye to my family? I know that you, Gianelli, Cohen, Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley lunatic prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter, and others, are interested in my family. They even targeted my son whose fingers were ripped off at Whole Foods. Leonard Cohen and lunatic prosecutor Streeter targeted Rutger over that issue and he definitely wanted to take the stand because he knows Cohen's a liar, Lindsey was physically abusive, and his brother's life was destroyed. I care about my family and that's why you and Gianelli have been relentlessly advised to back away from my famlly, Instead, you are now targeting my sons with Michelle Rice copied in and I am gathering and preserving the evidence of that fact.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
THE BEAUTY PAGEANT:

Susanne Walsh
Ms. Lynch, you are not only a washed out, alcoholic old bag, you are a mean and nasty, inside and out, old bag. I don't care about all your lies about Cohen, I like his music and what I know about him as a man, and your lies and slander will not change that. Stay in your black hole and cultivate your hate and wave good bye to your "family" they obviously don't care about you and neither do I.
Odzer Chenma
Walsh, I have no issues with alcohol or anything else for that matter. It's not a defense to criminal tax fraud or theft in any event. Fine, I'm an old bag. Cohen looked like a former meth addict perjuring himself on the witness stand. Does he want to compete now for who is cuter? How pathetic. That's where Leonard Cohen's mind has gone re. his theft, criminal tax fraud, false allegations about Phil Spector, etc. Well, perhaps the FBI's Quantico should actually profile him since he thinks we're in a beauty pageant. Leonard Cohen is the liar who perjures himself in every court of law he rolls into. Wave goodbye to my family? I know that you, Gianelli, Cohen, Alan Jackson, Steve Cooley lunatic prosecutor Sandra Jo Streeter, and others, are interested in my family. They even targeted my son whose fingers were ripped off at Whole Foods. Leonard Cohen and lunatic prosecutor Streeter targeted Rutger over that issue and he definitely wanted to take the stand because he knows Cohen's a liar, Lindsey was physically abusive, and his brother's life was destroyed. I care about my family and that's why you and Gianelli have been relentlessly advised to back away from my famlly, Instead, you are now targeting my sons with Michelle Rice copied in and I am gathering and preserving the evidence of that fact.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Odzer Chenma
Really? What's the issue now? Cohen wants to steal back my commissions. His greed is inconceivable. I know he defrauded Peter Lopez of $90,000. Cohen's money? His greed created his hell. Interesting that he has to engage in such public obscenity - lying to jurors; pretending I assailed his reputation over his drug abuse; concealing evidence; stealing from Machat & Machat; aligning himself with Gianelli who is slandering the 14th Sharmapa. What will Leonard Cohen do for an encore? His performance re. Phil Spector was not to be believed. That's why I told my lawyers - nail his ass. He's lying through his teeth. And now - Cohen has three versions of his good rock and roll versions of a gun story involving Phil Spector before LA Superior Court. The man's a thief. I am advising you to stop criminally harassing my children with Michelle Rice copied in. She is well aware of the fact that Rutger is a material witness. In fact, he knows that he was asked - after SWAT - to go in and sign over/transfer my house to Cohen/Kory. He contacted Douglas Penick about that and witnessed Lindsey lying to SWAT. I have a relationship with men - including the 14th Sharmapa who i definite talk to and communicate with; Yongzin Rinpoche; Choegon Rinpoche; Anam Thubten Rinpoche; Lingtrul Rinpoche; Gyaltrul Rinpoche; and many other enlightened beings - for instance, Dzongsar Khyentse Rinpoche. He's Gesar Mukpo's teacher and a friend of mine. Gesar Mukpo lived with Lorca Coihen and witnessed a great deal of insanity, drug abuse, and accusations about her father. He also witnessed Lindsey's daughters accusations about her father. He's a friend of my sons and a witness. Make no mistake about that. Cohen's relationship to Buddhism is fascinating - particularly now that his pal Gianelli has targeted Sharmapa. And Cohen lied about me and Oliver Stone to Lindsey. Lindsey will receive a subpoena and so will Oliver Stone. My former hair dresser is aware that Cohen's a pathological liar and Lindsey was physically abusive to me and my children. Choegon Rinpoche witnessed Lindsey's threats that he and Cohen would put me in jail. It was pre-meditated. Cohen thinks he can take on Choegon Rinpoche? Amazing.
(with Cohen's money)


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
The Revenge Of Dame Edith Sitwell - Leonard Cohen


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Odzer Chenma
Hey, the former drug addict is calling me an old bag? Well, at least I wasn't an old bag on the stand perjuring myself and confessing to it. That was Leonard Cohen - and it now involves Phil Spector. Are you bored with criminally harassing my children with Michelle Rice copied in - including Rutger who is a material witness? I think not and I have taken LAPD's advice - document and printed this criminal conduct. I didn't like it when Cohen looked at people defecating on one another in my presence; demanding that I read legal/bus docs to him while he soaked in bubble baths; etc. I also did not appreciate his asking me to contact my brother-in-law about Lorca Cohen's allegations that he molested her. Van Penick is aware of what unfolded there. Cohen and the prosecutor just LIED. Van Penick is also aware that I contacted him - for Cohen - re. Cohen's residence/tax issues in Canada. Cohen just lies, Walsh. Try to recover from your fan obsession. Have you watched Misery lately? Well, you're featured.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Dame Edith Stiwell's not someone I would be attracted to.  Nasty thought.

Odzer Chenma
leonard cohen - Google Search
www.google.com


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Sharmapa,
We're in a criminal beauty pageant.

Love,
Kelley

Odzer Chenma
Walsh, this is about my looks and not Cohen's criminal tax fraud and theft from me? You are writing my sons - including Rutger who is a material witness with Michelle Rice copied in. Cohen endorses your conduct.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Contacting Facebook's Legal Team now.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
HEY NUT:

Odzer Chenma
Hey listen nut. STOP writing me and targeting my children. Then you will no longer hear about me. Dolled up? Cohen testified that we were in a dating/intimate relationship - not I. How would you know what I look like lunatic? You have never seen or met me. Leonard Cohen never knew you when I worked with him - for approximately 20 years (including when I worked for Marty Machat and Steven Machat is no witness for Cohen unless Cohen wants to prove we had a palimony settlement). Look nut - I'm not interested in a woman who pathetically targeted me and my children for years. Gianellí's obviously connected to Jackson, Dixon, and Streeter. Good luck nut. You are the embodiment of what people (journalists included) would talk to me about Cohen's cult victims. I have advised you to stay away from my chlldren. But you and Rice seem dead set on criminally harassing us and engaging in witness tampering. I have the evidence now. You have been advised to CEASE AND DESIST.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
I tend to doubt I looked dolled up since I never wear make up.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Odzer Chenma
Cease and desist psychopath. Leonard Cohen stole from me and some sleazebag old broad is not going to criminally harass me and my family in an attempt to pressure me over Leonard Cohen. The man's pathetic and evil. People are in shock at his conduct. You and Gianelli - they know. You're psychopaths.
Stop contacting my family. No one's interested in your lies and slander.
You are one nasty old ugly broad. I guess that's why you have targeted me since 2009. You don't have a life. My family is not your life and I am suing Cohen over your criminal harassment. Make no mistake about that. Feel free to underestimate me. Gianelli has already been raised in court documents. A man who lies to the IRS and FBI and is obsessed with Phil Spector, aligned with Michelle Blaine, and targeting me over Leonard Cohen.
The lawsuit is being filed against Cohen within the next two weeks. Nothing is going to change that. I've already addressed his fraud, theft, concealment, perjury, etc. in my writ. The court accepted that document.
Kelley Lynch


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Speaking of targeting mothers - right on time:

Susanne Walsh
Yes, Ms. Lynch, I am "old", I am a mother and a grandmother to many beautiful children with whom I have a wonderful loving relationship, as you can see on my pictures, I also have many friends and a very full life. You, however look much much older than your actual age, you look like a washed out, sloppy, alcoholic bag lady, and even when you were younger and all dolled up (with Cohen's money) you looked like a cheap bimbo. Nobody will EVER believe that Leonard Cohen is responsible for your shabby life, you created your own hell and now you have to live in it. I am however sick and bored with all your repeated bull shit, if you have not drank yourself in the grave in ten years, you will still be writing the same garbage, you will never sue Mr. Cohen or Mr. Gianelli, you will never write a book, you will never have a job or a relationship, with a man, with your children or grandchildren, long after Cohen is dead and gone you will still write your stupid stuff that nobody will read. That is the hell you have created and enjoy it, I am done with you and your lies.
Susanne Walsh.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Kelley Lynch <kelley.lynch.2010@gmail.com> wrote:
Like · · · Share · Promote


--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.



--
In order to convict under Section 7201 of the Code, the basic elements that must be proven are (1) the existence of a tax deficiency, (2) an affirmative act constituting an evasion or attempted evasion of the tax, and (3) willfulness.
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)